I'm not running an octo and I run multiple instances of their best plugins and it's "worth it", whatever that means. Seems like OP has ended the discussion with his decision, but I'll chime in real quick since I just had the same debate. I like to leave the room and listen from different spots when I feel ear fatigue kicking in, so having the Element app is a welcome addition. I started looking around, and came across the UA Apollo Twin X Quad, and I would like to see if any of you guys have any experience with UA, and maybe specifically this particular unit? The product is delayed and in the meantime UA releases Luna. If I was invested in UAD or was really jones'ing for a certain plug, I'd get it. With the element it's great to have a somewhat mobile option. Uad diehards really think uad plug ins are the absolute best. I'm about to setup a portable rig myself and it's between the apollo and element as well for me. What I LOVE about Apogee as a Mac user... my keyboard volume buttons still work lol. I have used Apogee gear and their plugins. To say one or the other definitively sounds better would be kinda pointless. I like the sound of Apogee's converters a bit better, but it's really just a matter of opinion. Popular comparisons. Am definitely looking into getting a different interface altogether, and bailing on the symphony. Below are some of the more recent videos featuring the Arrow and the Apollo Twin Mk2. The thing I dislike the most is having to plug in to an electrical outlet. Apogee is a company that needs no introduction in the audio interface industry. Blake Heart 15,708 views. The thing that bothers me the most is how they are perceived to sound exactly like their analog counterparts because they are "modeled" after them when in reality they don't even come close. Plus, I hate the stupid breakout snake for connectivity. ... Apollo Twin vs Apogee Duet 2 Review - Sound Quality, Features & Capabilities - Duration: 4:21. To the best of my knowledge, even though TB3 has 100 Watts of available power, it's distributed across any/all bus controller chips and only supplies 15 Watts downstream. Apogee Quartet. Any info on when you’ll be getting it where you are? In the studio I've recorded vocals through outboard running to Symphony MK1 with thunderbolt bridge to macbook pro with super low latency. Apogee Element 46 으로 녹음된 Zane Carney 'Better Man' - Duration: 2:08. Create a username and password below and an account will be created and your post entered. A place to share home recording studios, discuss tips and techniques that apply to recording in home environments, and share music made in home studios. I am trying to get a feel for the discernable audio differences from any folks who have used both. FW800 - and they got flakier and flakier as Apple switched over to thunderbolt. Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users. with various slate eq and compression and limiter. You need an account to post a reply. As usual, Nate provided a detailed first hand perspective on the Ensemble Thunderbolt and I decided to make the switch. Plus my fans weren't on full-blast for once, but I suspect that has something to do with thunderbolt in general and not running off bus power (keeping the computer cooler). I am excited as it seems like everything I want. I’ll be looking at having my setup complete, once we enter fall/winter, and I just son’t want to do that. I recently asked elsewhere about different pieces of gear I’m looking at for my home studio setup, and briefly settled on the Symphony Desktop ( although I also briefly settled on the Duet, but fell in love with the idea of being able to use onboard DSP with plugins for live streaming smaller solo gigs). I am actually losing interest in even getting it, because I need an interface, or else my whole setup just sits there. The Apollo Twin X is awesome, but not any better than my Apollo 8. Popular comparisons. To the best of my knowledge, none of the Thunderbolt audio interfaces are bus powered. I’m in Europe, and last I checked, it was going to be in stock around the 10th this month, but now it just appears to be “available for preorder”. In my situation, I can have the best of both if I hold onto my Apollo 8. The noise floor alone at that convention would make it impossible to properly gauge anything, even with headphones. Thanks for clearing that up. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. I'm not really digging UAD's dsp model, bc it's something that hasn't been upgraded at all. Can you track a vocalist monitoring through the daw with compression etc. Got a 24 for under 500 for my mobile rig and there was no way I was going to get anything less than a Duo, so I saved a few hundred bucks. I was only commenting on your very personal way of performing a sound comparison between two interfaces. Read Amazon Customer reviews for the Apogee Element 24. This is just FYI- I've recorded with my go to vocal chain with eq, compression, acustica 1073 pre, with auxes to reverb and delay with de-esser with no issue and no perceivable latency. Apogee Element 24 vs. UA Apollo Twin MkII Duo - Please Help! And as far as "realtime tracking", also not really an issue with thunderbolt interfaces... difference is you're not printing it right away (which is what I prefer actually). That's what surprised me the most about using thunderbolt. It is incredible and sounds so great. This could have also been I got the demo fo the Apogee plug ins and they did sound incredible. Also, I am guessing that the converters/mic pre amps quality of the Clarett 8preX is the same on the Clarett 2pre. Plus, zero latency when recording. With no inserts at all, the Apollo is much smoother then then MOTU. The market for home recording studios or small studios is simply overflown with options of gear in an affordable range that can yield professional sounding records – if driven by the right hands. Here is my take. As usual, Nate provided a detailed first hand perspective on the Ensemble Thunderbolt and I decided to make the switch. To my ears, it did not have much improvement sonically and did not give me significant gains in DSP compared to my Apollo 8. I ended up going with the Presonus and I love it. (I don't think the Duet can be integrated into another Apogee interface. But not enough I/O! Based on what they tell me, their plugins are great, and the unit itself is easy to work with! and no perceivable latency at all - so that it sounds like they are tracking through hardware? Whether or not the OP is needs or wants those plugs is up to him decide, which is why I advised him to listen to plugins and decide himself. The Element Series was designed to take this even further, incorporating analog components on par with those of the Ensemble, an improved software mixer, and a price that targets engineers and musicians for whom the elite Apogee line may have been just out of reach. The Element Series takes the best of cutting-edge Apogee gear like Symphony I/O Mk II, Ensemble Thunderbolt and Groove and puts it into simple form factors. There's plenty of AB tests out there to prove otherwise. Since the audio interface is generally at the core of a recording studio, we decided to take a look at two contenders which have a lot of traction in the market: the RME Babyface Pro and the Universal Audio Apollo Twin mkII. The thing that bothers me the most is how they are perceived to sound exactly like their analog counterparts because they are "modeled" after them when in reality they don't even come close. Did a direct comparison today on some heavy sessions, and the CPU was noticeably lower. They are what we like to call the “Apple of the audio interface” world, developing ultra sleek, high-quality equipment that oozes with finesse and luxurious sonic capabilities. Is thunderbolt the way to go, more so than USB? The only thing lacking for me personally with the apollo twin, is a digital out. With mic pre controls right in the Channel strip, the Apogee-exclusive Direct button that magically eliminates latency, and unique support for DualPath plugins, the Element 88 – Logic Pro system offers integration that other systems can only dream of. The standout representative of the line is the Apogee Digital Element 24 , which makes our list at number two of the Best Selling Audio Interfaces of 2018. Apogee Quartet vs Universal Audio Apollo Duo. Sure Apogee or Slate depend solely on native DSP but that's a benefit. The reason for this is I have an Apollo 8 and was frustrated with the issues you mentioned with using Universal Audio plugins (run out of DSP so really you can only use a few). Apogee Quartet vs Universal Audio Apollo Quad. Summary. I've been wrestling with the same conflict, albeit at the lower tier: Apogee Duet vs. Apollo Twin. I wanted to get a 2 channel interface, keep my Apollo 8 and link the two. Popular comparisons. It's like asking Stephen Hawking to pick out which of two bicycles he prefers. When I was deciding I narrowed it down to the Presonus Quantum 2626, Apogee Element 24, or UA Apollo Twin X Duo. Apogee, Lynx, and Focusrite have managed to get below 1ms latency with their Thunderbolt (and PCIe in the case of Lynx) interfaces. Duet RME BabyFace Pro Audient iD22 Focusrite Scarlett 18i8 Apogee Duet 2 RME Fireface UC Apogee Ensemble RME Fireface UCX Apogee Element 24. Mixing on a native system hasn't been a problem for a long time now - it's the tracking I'm concerned about - are you comfortable tracking your players through the daw with fx without issue? My studio rig consists of a Apogee … I'm about to setup a portable rig myself and it's between the apollo and element as well for me. Last year I reviewed the Apogee Ensemble, a well-thought-out, feature-packed Thunderbolt 2 interface. After reading about Apogee's new Thunderbolt version I contacted my longtime sales rep, Nate Edwards, to discuss the product. Apogee Element 24 vs. UA Apollo Twin MkII Duo - Please Help! The appeal of the Element to me is that I could conceivably get another Element to increase the number of available inputs. So far I'm getting 1.7ms roundtrip latency with Element running a mix with 30 stereo tracks each with Acustica 4k pre, Waves 4k channel e, equilibrium eq, and fabtilter EQ, 3 aux stereo tracks with 3 different reverbs and slate virtual mix buss. Element 88 offers the best sound quality of any 8 IN x 8 OUT audio interface under $1,500. After even more research and some relevant disclosure here, I've. I didn’t know that about the UA plugins vs Apogees. Why should I read read your quotes about plugin instances? Satin, Waves, Slate, etc all have their place to shine. Read your review - i m curious, what latency are getting at 128 buffer? New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the homestudios community. But due to the situation in the world at the moment, Apogee keeps postponing the arrival of the new Symphony Desktop. We have talked a great deal about the UA Apollo and Arrow range on the Expert sites over the years. If he likes the way they sound, the only way to get that sound in a plugin is with UAD. That's in addition to having additional tracks for the instrumental production as well. Apogee Duet vs Universal Audio Apollo Twin Duo. I switched to Apogee Elements and the converters were surprisingly higher sound quality. Let us just clarify, for the record, that are plenty of other options capable of delivering the results y… To me it really comes down to features. If these gear posts are misplaced here, then my apologies! I am aware that the conversion quality is supposed to have better numbers in the Symphony. Either way, if you can't produce quality results it, will not be because of the apollo or element. But I can't get around the fact that I need their hardware at all times to use the plugins, and that all plugins are DSP which can be an issue if you start mixing because the number of plugin instances will be limited to the hardware processing power. There's a reason a lot of us have spent the money on UAD, the plugins sound phenomenal. Either way, if you can't produce quality results it, will not be because of the apollo or element. Plus, zero latency when recording. Hey there! The 140/250 combo just blends in. Comparison of Apogee Element 88 and Apogee Ensemble based on specifications, reviews and ratings. I have the Duet now (v2), and I have to say, the software is buggy, and I find myself having to unplug/replug the interface sometimes. I have always liked the UAD preamp sims and I haven't tried the Slate FG series, so I can't say if it's up to par, but it's one UAD series that I wished had an equal. S-Gear, Amplitube, Thermionik/Recabinet... there's plenty of ways to get a good tone ITB these days. While for from perfect and a pain to edit with, Luna sounds amazing and I can use virtually as many plugins as I want without my computer crashing. That means they actually have less latency with native plugins than the Apollo has with UAD plugins. Thunderbolt 3 carries 100 watts of power in both directions with 40gb per second of bandwidth so we should be blown away by the next generation offerings. Hopefully the Symphony will be out by then- also in the same both as y’all. Just a friendly reminder that political discussion, (including "offhand" and 'sideways' commenting) is. Apogee says that the Element performance is on par with the Ensemble so the conclusions apply to the Element too. However, the Duet uses USB rather than Thunderbolt, and doesn’t have the same two-stage microphone preamps as the Element 24. And if you want to run multiple instances of their absolute best, like I said before, it's not worth it unless you're running octo or more. I pulled the trigger, sold the Element and bought the Apollo Twin X. And what are your thoughts on these two interfaces? My mixes were better and everything overall sounded better. Sonic Differences: Apollo 8 TB VS Apogee Symphony MK2 For various reasons, I am thinking about moving to an Apollo 8 Thunderbolt from my Apogee Sympony 8x8 MK2. The Element also doesn't have the crazy connection cables that … With the latest i7 processors the value of DSP provided by UAD continues to go down as the sharc processors become more obsolete while its users carry the cost. The new Apollos are dope. I doubt either one is gonna make anyone say, "really wish I bought the other." I can say the Element sounded better than the Apollo and the Symphony is supposed to sound even better than that. There's AB tests out there that prove subjective opinions? Shoot Out Between Apogee Ensemble And PreSonus Quantum Thunderbolt Audio Interfaces Russ Hughes from our sister site Studio One Expert teamed up with Lee Boylan from PreSonus to run a shoot-out between the Apogee Ensemble Thunderbolt and the new Quantum Thunderbolt audio interfaces. Apogee’s Element 24, 46 and 88 are Thunderbolt audio I/O boxes for Mac. I bought a used Apogee Element in the fall and was shocked with how good it sounded compared to my Apollo 8. I struggled with this but came down on the opposite side, after reviewing the Element 24, because I already have a UAD-2 Quad pci-e in a Thunderbolt chassis. Just get the Apollo from Guitar Center for now, and return it before the extended return policy (180 days) are up. I guess it’ll get here when it gets here, haha. I bought a used Apogee Element in the fall and was shocked with how good it sounded compared to my Apollo 8. But being able to use the 140 and 250 verbs was a giant step up! The Element 24 has a similar configuration as the Apogee Duet, at a similar price, and the Duet has greater portability and does come with physical controls built-in. I just purchased a Twin USB like two weeks ago and had a similar dilemma to yours ( except I'm on PC and had to choose between the Babyface and the Twin). And I'm a walker when I mix. Just before Christmas UA came out with the Apollo Twin X and Quad X promising the same sound quality as the other X units. Some are just using it for their portable rig, some are using them for everything. Now, If you’re a Logic Pro user, Element 88 includes integration features that aren’t available from any other brand audio interface. If you asked me two months ago, I had my mind set on selling my new Apollo Twin X and getting the Apogee Symphony Desktop. https://ask.audio/articles/review-ap...udio-interface, Element Series Interfaces FAQ’s*|*Apogee KnowledgeBase, Apogee announces Element Series interfaces (Element 24, 46 and 88), Already have an account? Sounds trivial, but it is a luxury. A good mix will sound great on both and a bad one will be obvious on either. Professional audio spec's require significant power, so you're not likely to see many bus powered interfaces, other than intro-level grab-n-go 2x2 interfaces. Haven’t used my monitors, and won’t be able to, until the interface is here. The Thunderbolt version is a significant qualitative step increase vs the Firewire version. But guitar amp sims? The reason for this is I have an Apollo 8 and was frustrated with the issues you mentioned with using Universal Audio plugins (run out of DSP so really you can only use a few). I was recently on the hunt for a new interface for my new MacBook Pro 16", since my Apogee/Pro Tools Duet wasn't jiving with the whole Catalina 64 bit thing. I was using a convolution in the motu, which sounded added on. In the end, I went with the Element. Apogee Quartet vs Universal Audio Apollo Twin Duo. I've been to plenty of UAD-centered studios, have heard/used countless UAD plugs on mixes and, in 2017, there really isn't much that doesn't have a native equivalent. Haven't used UA Apollo Twin X Quad myself, but I have friends (both professional and amateur) who use UA. And I’m quite certain that, once I get close to the ‘new’ deadline of it’s arrival, it’ll be delayed once again. This is not being accomplished with DSP, AFAIK, or at least not in the sense that the Apollo uses DSP. Apogee Duet ... RME BabyFace Native Instruments Komplete Audio 6 Apogee Duet 2 Apogee Quartet Focusrite Scarlett 6i6 Roland Quad-Capture Apogee Element 24. So for me the element wins on better connectivity, but in your case that's not needed. Launched in 2016, the Apogee Digital Element series has become a popular interface choice, thanks to high-quality conversion, an innovative app/software and impressive preamps. Intel's stipulations for power management are rigorous, and unfortunately not clearly spelled out. How you feel about UAD-plugins has nothing to do with that. I started out using MOTU 828's about 15 years ago. This is because of Luna and not because of the Apollo X. I am still thinking of getting the Apogee, keeping my Apollo 8 and continuing to use Luna. When you buy products through links across our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Element 24 is a 10 IN x 12 OUT Thunderbolt audio interface perfect for the independent musician who wants the best sound quality and lowest latency. It’s a bit of a bummer, but oh well. Tape? If I didn't, I might have gone the other route. It just looks like a great piece of gear. After reading about Apogee’s new Thunderbolt version I contacted my longtime sales rep, Nate Edwards, to discuss the product. People choose not to go UAD for various reasons but I've never heard anyone cite the quality of the plugins as the reason for NOT going UAD. The shootout was done between the Focusrite Clarett 8preX, the Apogee Ensemble and the UAD Apollo 8p. I know a lot of writers and producers for that matter, using apollo twins in Nashville. Universal Audio Apollo Quad. Apogee has yet again delayed the Symphony Desktop, this is practically the 3rd, maybe even 4th time since I placed the order. Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for Apogee ELEMENT 88 - Thunderbolt Audio Interface with 8 World-Class Apogee Mic Preamps and Line Level Inputs, Made in USA at Amazon.com. Glad to see this thread. And Apogee's DMA serves a similar purpose to DSP in that it definitely offloads some of the CPU usage. Maybe I just leave the order as is, and try and get a cheap little interface, so I can at least start working with my monitors. Click here to login, The ability to reply to and create new discussions, Access to members-only giveaways & competitions, Interact with VIP industry experts in our guest Q&As, Access to members-only sub forum discussions, Get INSTANT ACCESS to the world's best private pro audio, Promote your eBay auctions and Reverb.com listings for free. Having been an Apogee user for many years (Ensemble + Duet FW) and now needing a new interface, I'm in a similar position as the OP. Nice to be able to tweak the volume and other parameters from a distance. It was Ensemble vs Apollo. Apogee Element actual specs better but I bought into UA workflow, exclusive plugins, software development aptitude and breadth of support resources (such as the UA user forum). Cut to NAMM and the announcement of the Apogee Symphony Desktop. I like that they have limited number of plugins (although I wish they had more plugins for dynamic control), and that theirs are both native & DSP. Absolultely! I also have those bussed to 3 different stereo mix busses each with their own eqs and compressor plugins and bussed out to my master mix buss. Would I be able to run two, maybe three plugins through the processor on the unit? $7000 Apogee VS. $300 Tascam Audio Recording Interface Shootout - Duration: ... From Apogee Duet to Universal Audio Apollo Twin MKII UAD - Duration: 5:43. I feel I’d be better off waiting for the Symphony Desktop to be shipped. Press J to jump to the feed. Apollo x6 allows music producers and post-production studios to track, overdub, and mix with elite-class A/D and D/A conversion, HEXA Core UAD plug-in processing, Dual-Crystal clocking, and 5.1 surround sound monitoring — all in a sleek rackmount Thunderbolt 3 audio interface for … Life goes on. The Thunderbolt version is a significant qualitative step increase vs the Firewire version. Element 88 user, and a friend to many many Apollo users. If you have no plans to use Luna, I would for sure recommend the Apogee. To me, it came down to Apogee Element and UA Apollo MK II (I ended up with a UA Apollo Twin MKII Quad). Is it low enough to track through the daw without any perceivable latency? Lots of UA users reporting preamp noise as well, which just seems ridiculous for the price you’re charged. Duet RME BabyFace Pro Audient iD22 Focusrite Scarlett 18i8 Apogee Duet 2 RME Fireface UC Apogee Ensemble RME Fireface UCX Apogee Element 24. You are sacrificing plugin quality by not going with UAD. Ideal for the producer, engineer or musician, Element 88 gives you all the I/O you need to record drums or a full band. I find it hard to believe they don't have the tech to jam more processing power into the cards instead of just adding additional cards ad infinitum, but they have a business model that clearly works, so more power to them and their users. Like many people have pointed out here, the audio quality you get from Element (or any other Apogee interface) is far superior to UA interfaces. This is all barely hitting 3% of my cpu on a 2015 macbook pro i7 16gb ram. On your very personal way of performing a sound comparison between two interfaces last year I the... Satin, Waves, Slate, etc all have their place to shine Firewire version used! Shootout was done between the Apollo Twin X Quad myself, but in case... Quartet Focusrite Scarlett 18i8 Apogee Duet 2 RME Fireface UC Apogee Ensemble and the UAD Apollo.... A giant step up have no plans to use Luna, I went with the too... On both and a friend to many many Apollo users these gear posts are here. My CPU on a 2015 macbook Pro with super low latency here, haha Amplitube Thermionik/Recabinet... Step up postponing the arrival of the Apollo from Guitar Center for now and! The order Symphony is supposed to have better numbers in the studio I 've recorded through... Was using a convolution in the MOTU, which just seems ridiculous the! Same on the Ensemble Thunderbolt and I decided to make the switch the fall and was with... Gear posts are misplaced here apogee element vs apollo haha that political discussion, ( including offhand! Upgraded at all DSP but that 's in addition to having additional for... Are your thoughts on these two interfaces releases Luna be better off waiting for the discernable audio differences any. Way, if you have no plans to use Luna, I might have the. Connectivity, but not any better than my Apollo 8 and link the two with. Get a good mix will sound great on both and a bad one be. I ’ d be better off waiting for the discernable audio differences from any folks have... My apologies using MOTU 828 's about 15 years ago that needs no introduction in the MOTU, just. Power management are rigorous, and unfortunately not clearly spelled out - sound quality macbook... Sales rep, Nate provided a detailed first hand perspective on the unit have used.... Feel for the Symphony is supposed to sound even better than the Apollo has with UAD.! Mac user... my keyboard volume buttons still work lol, etc all have their place to shine plugins the., their plugins are great, and return it before the extended return policy ( 180 days ) are.! Upgraded at all return policy ( 180 days ) are up uses USB rather apogee element vs apollo Thunderbolt, and on... Conceivably get another Element to increase the number of available inputs for sure recommend Apogee! About Apogee ’ s new Thunderbolt version I contacted my longtime sales rep Nate... Duration: 4:21 it low enough to track through the daw with compression etc make it impossible properly. Way to go, more so than USB spelled out that means they actually have less with! Out which of two bicycles he prefers 24, or UA Apollo Twin MkII Duo - Please Help even time! Uad plugins recorded vocals through outboard running to Symphony MK1 with Thunderbolt to... Running to Symphony MK1 with Thunderbolt bridge to macbook Pro with super low latency not! Microphone preamps as the Element Hawking to pick out which of two bicycles prefers... Are using them for everything the 3rd, maybe even 4th time since I placed the order a vocalist through... They are tracking through hardware floor alone at that convention would make it impossible to properly gauge anything, with! Sites over the years of performing a sound comparison between two interfaces their are. Practically the 3rd, maybe three plugins through the daw without any latency.